Is Size Really Everything?

Source: Ken French, JQR Capital


Is Size Really Everything?


In certain parts of life, size is a stereotypical measure of success - the size of your house, for example. The amount of land in your name. The speed of your new car. In the investment world, the ending value of your portfolio may be the ultimate measure of financial success. I often remark to my clients that when we think about the long term (translation: decades), the short term decisions are both trivial and easy. Some quantitative investment professionals (AKA quants) have hundreds of individual factors in their quiver of data from which to discern long term patterns - or payoffs. A factor is the investing term for an individual piece of measurable data for a stock. In this discussion, we will focus on seven factors published by Professor Ken French on his website.

What Can We Measure?


Yahoo Finance data allows us to look at about 123 individual pieces of data for each stock in our universe. As a reminder, market capitalization for a company is defined by current share price multiplied by current shares outstanding. It is one measure of the size of a firm and is sometimes referred to as the “market” equity. This is in contrast to the “book” equity or book value presented on the balance sheets of each periodic quarterly (10-Q) or yearly (10-K) report.


Ken French return data starts in 1927 for two of his famous factors - market equity (ME) and the book equity divided by market equity ratio (BE2ME). More data started showing up in 1928 in the form of the dividend payment divided by market equity (DP2ME) factor. The rest of the data for individual factors fills in between 1952 and 1964. So, the earliest we can compare all seven of his individual factors is 1964. This just so happens to be my birth year and it gives us 58 years of observations for our cross sectional view of factor investment performance.


Source: Ken French, JQR Capital


The chart above shows the median annualized performance of seven factors grouped into five quintiles between 1964 and 2022. The seven factors are as follows moving left to right along the base of the chart.


  1. Investments divided by total assets (Inv2TA)

  2. Operating profit divided by book equity (OP2BE)

  3. Cash flow divided by market equity (CF2ME)

  4. Net income divided by market equity (NI2ME)

  5. Dividends paid divided by market equity (DP2ME)

  6. Book equity divided by market equity (BE2ME)

  7. Market equity (ME)


The five quintiles in each of the seven factors are consistently colored to show the difference in annualized performance between the smallest quintile (Q1) to the largest quintile (Q5) over this period. Visual inspection of the seven factors in this chart show that Inv2TA and ME both exhibit a negative payoff with increasing size. So - for these two factors - smaller has actually been better from a performance standpoint over the past 58 years.

How Do They Compare?

Another way to describe this data is to calculate the slopes of the quintile payoffs. Since a negative slope provides useful investing information, taking the absolute values of these slopes is one way to measure the usefulness of a factor in the stock selection process. Using this methodology, here is a ranking of the seven individual factors published by Professor French between 1964 and 2022.


Factor

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

SlopeQ

ABS SlopeQ

Rank SlopeQ

Inv2TA

22.09

17.68

16.62

15.83

10.81

-2.44

2.44

2

OP2BE

16.17

16.53

16.03

16.50

16.13

-0.01

0.01

7

CF2ME

12.75

15.27

16.50

18.29

20.95

1.94

1.94

3

NI2ME

13.57

15.12

15.91

17.32

20.28

1.56

1.56

4

DP2ME

15.42

15.94

16.32

16.87

15.93

0.19

0.19

6

BE2ME

10.66

14.43

16.08

18.08

22.60

2.75

2.75

1

ME

17.88

14.05

13.81

13.33

11.88

-1.27

1.27

5

Source: Ken French, JQR Capital


This table ranks book equity divided by market equity (BE2ME) as the most influential factor of the seven individual factors published by Professor French on his website. Investment divided by total assets (Inv2TA) is the second highest ranked and cash flow divided by market equity (CF2ME) is the third ranked individual factor. Next time we will look at the correlation of returns between these individual factors.

References

https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/wilshire5000equityindex.asp

https://www.brainyquote.com/topics/overnight-success-quotes


Location: 23 Foxridge Rd, West Hartford, CT 06107, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Strategic Versus Tactical Asset Allocation

Image
  Source : FRED Data, JQR Capital The Market Portfolio A few weeks ago we introduced a cash asset to augment our efficient frontier set of bond plus stock portfolios.The cash asset allowed us to combine cash with the one portfolio along the efficient frontier that had the highest return versus risk (AKA the Sharpe Ratio). This one portfolio can be thought of as the tangency portfolio or - more commonly - the market portfolio (MP). The mix of bonds versus stocks in the MP will change over time with changes in interest rates and changes in expected returns for our bond and stock indices. The chart below is a quick snapshot of how the risk free rate of cash interest (Rf) interacts with the efficient frontier to create the market portfolio (MP) at only one point in time. This snapshot was taken a few weeks ago. Source : FRED Data, JQR Capital Introducing Naive Forecasting  The chart shown above was generated using average return and risk data over the 1973 to 2022 time period. The hardest
Read more

The Four Most Dangerous Words

Image
The Four Most Dangerous Words... The late great Sir John Marks Templeton - of Templeton Growth Fund fame - once quipped that the four most dangerous words to an investor were: "this time is different." Many market strategists warn that the sky is falling or that the investing principles that worked in the past no longer hold true in this new world of artificial intelligence and political unrest. The truth is that the facts and situations are (slightly) different from anything in the near or distant past. The rest of the story is that the human reaction, however, is the same and reasonably predictable. Read MORE ! Mean Reversion Works In my blog post two weeks ago, I used the analogy of a spring traveling through time while being exposed to compression and extension forces. This spring never gets smushed into a pancake - just the way it never snaps in half. When the forces are briefly taken away, the spring reverts back to the normal (unforced) state. This same principle can b
Read more

Take Your 2023 RMDs

Image
  Take Your 2023 RMDs If someone in your family has turned 73 in 2023, it may be time to start taking the required minimum distributions (RMDs) from an old 401(k) or a traditional IRA. These distributions are required so that the IRS can collect tax revenues on these “before tax” contributions. The laws for these RMDs recently changed and HERE is a quick guide designed to help you estimate how much you need to take out before April 1, 2024. The good news is that the penalty for missing your RMD has gone down from 50% to 25%. Happy Holidays! Convert To A Roth IRA One way to minimize your lifetime tax burden may be to convert your old 401(k) to a Roth IRA. Two of my financial planning clients recently toyed with the idea of converting their before tax money to after tax money through the Roth conversion process. For one of them (a single female, aged 69), a Roth conversion could allow her to generate $55,413 in additional wealth over her expected lifetime. For the other planning client
Read more